AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website
Generalitat Valenciana
Website
Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website
Cicloplast
Website
Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website
Anarpla
Website
Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website
nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website
Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website
Zicla
Website
Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website
PEFC
Website
ALQUIENVAS
Website
DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website
UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website
OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website
BERL� S.A.
Website
CM PLASTIK
Website
TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS
INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website
RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Study on prediction of blasting cracking radius of liquid CO<sub>2</sub> in coal
In this study, we sought to improve the efficiency of coal seam gas extraction, master the characteristics of different factors on the liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) phase change blasting cracking radius, and effectively predict the hole spacing. In this study, we used ANSYS/LS-DYNA numerical simulation software to predict the crack radius of liquid CO2 phase change blasting combined with orthogonal design scheme. The results showed that the primary and secondary factors affecting the fracture radius of liquid CO2 phase change blasting were in ground stress, gas pressure, coal firmness coefficient, and gas content. The fracture radius decreased with the increase of in ground stress and decreased with the increase of gas pressure, coal firmness coefficient, and gas content, which was linear. A prediction model for predicting the cracking radius of liquid CO2 phase change blasting based on four groups of different factors was established. Through the double verification of numerical simulation and field industrial test, the cracking radius of liquid CO2 phase change blasting ranged from 2 m to 2.5 m. The maximum error of numerical simulation was 2.8%, and the maximum error of field industrial test was 5.93%.
» Author: Jinzhang Jia, Yumo Wu, Dan Zhao, Bin Li, Dongming Wang
» Reference: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280742
» Publication Date: 23/01/2023
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es