
AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website

Generalitat Valenciana
Website

Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website

Cicloplast
Website

Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website

Anarpla
Website

Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website

nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website

Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website

Zicla
Website

Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website

PEFC
Website

ALQUIENVAS
Website

DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website

UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website

OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website

BERL� S.A.
Website

CM PLASTIK
Website

TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS

INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website

RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Energy and exergy analysis of MSW-based IGCC power/polygeneration systems
Since municipal solid waste (MSW) is a negatively priced, abundant, and essentially renewable feedstock, energy recovered from MSW is a useful technology to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, and also reduces the expenses needed to dispose of MSW. Three configurations of MSW-based IGCC power system (Design 1), MSW-based IGCC polygeneration system (Design 2), and CaO-based IGCC polygeneration system (Design 3) are proposed. Design 1 uses a combination of an identified MSW gasifier, an integrated intermittent chemical-loop air separation (IICLAS), and Rankine and Brayton cycles to generate electricity and achieve the high concentration of CO2 emissions around 93.3%~94.7%. The process for co-production of DME and MeOH in Design 2, which replaces the Rankine cycle in Design 1, could increase the net energy efficiency of Design 1 by 71.6%, but the total CO2 emissions from Design 2 are merely 7.97% of Design 1. The calcium looping gasification (CaLG) process in Design 3, which replaces the MSW gasifier in Design 2, could increase the production rate of DME of Design 2 by 12.5%. The CO2 concentration from the calcinator in Design 3 is higher than CO2 concentration in flue gas from Designs 1 and 2 by 2.0%~3.5%. Through exergy analysis, the overall exergy efficiency of Design 3 is lower than Designs 1 and 2 by 3.2%~10.1% due to the exergy destruction rate and ratio in the gasification zone of Design 3 higher than other designs. The GaLG process could increase the DME yield as well as the outlet CO2 concentration, but this approach design induces a higher exergy loss.

» Author: Wei Wu, Lei Zheng, Bin Shi, Po-Chih Kuo
» Publication Date: 15/06/2021
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es
