AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website
Generalitat Valenciana
Website
Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website
Cicloplast
Website
Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website
Anarpla
Website
Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website
nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website
Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website
Zicla
Website
Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website
PEFC
Website
ALQUIENVAS
Website
DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website
UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website
OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website
BERL� S.A.
Website
CM PLASTIK
Website
TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS
INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website
RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Energy and exergy analysis of MSW-based IGCC power/polygeneration systems
Since municipal solid waste (MSW) is a negatively priced, abundant, and essentially renewable feedstock, energy recovered from MSW is a useful technology to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, and also reduces the expenses needed to dispose of MSW. Three configurations of MSW-based IGCC power system (Design 1), MSW-based IGCC polygeneration system (Design 2), and CaO-based IGCC polygeneration system (Design 3) are proposed. Design 1 uses a combination of an identified MSW gasifier, an integrated intermittent chemical-loop air separation (IICLAS), and Rankine and Brayton cycles to generate electricity and achieve the high concentration of CO2 emissions around 93.3%~94.7%. The process for co-production of DME and MeOH in Design 2, which replaces the Rankine cycle in Design 1, could increase the net energy efficiency of Design 1 by 71.6%, but the total CO2 emissions from Design 2 are merely 7.97% of Design 1. The calcium looping gasification (CaLG) process in Design 3, which replaces the MSW gasifier in Design 2, could increase the production rate of DME of Design 2 by 12.5%. The CO2 concentration from the calcinator in Design 3 is higher than CO2 concentration in flue gas from Designs 1 and 2 by 2.0%~3.5%. Through exergy analysis, the overall exergy efficiency of Design 3 is lower than Designs 1 and 2 by 3.2%~10.1% due to the exergy destruction rate and ratio in the gasification zone of Design 3 higher than other designs. The GaLG process could increase the DME yield as well as the outlet CO2 concentration, but this approach design induces a higher exergy loss.
» Author: Wei Wu, Lei Zheng, Bin Shi, Po-Chih Kuo
» Publication Date: 15/06/2021
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es