AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website
Generalitat Valenciana
Website
Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website
Cicloplast
Website
Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website
Anarpla
Website
Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website
nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website
Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website
Zicla
Website
Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website
PEFC
Website
ALQUIENVAS
Website
DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website
UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website
OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website
BERL� S.A.
Website
CM PLASTIK
Website
TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS
INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website
RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Simultaneous ventilation in the Covid-19 pandemic. A bench study
COVID-19 pandemic sets the healthcare system to a shortage of ventilators. We aimed at assessing tidal volume (VT) delivery and air recirculation during expiration when one ventilator is divided into 2 test-lungs. The study was performed in a research laboratory in a medical ICU of a University hospital. An ICU (V500) and a lower-level ventilator (Elis?e 350) were attached to two test-lungs (QuickLung) through a dedicated flow-splitter. A 50 mL/cmH2O Compliance (C) and 5 cmH2O/L/s Resistance (R) were set in both A and B test-lungs (A C50R5 / B C50R5, step1), A C50-R20 / B C20-R20 (step 2), A C20-R20 / B C10-R20 (step 3), and A C50-R20 / B C20-R5 (step 4). Each ventilator was set in volume and pressure control mode to deliver 800mL VT. We assessed VT from a pneumotachograph placed immediately before each lung, pendelluft air, and expiratory resistance (circuit and valve). Values are median (1st-3rd quartiles) and compared between ventilators by non-parametric tests. Between Elis?e 350 and V500 in volume control VT in A/B test- lungs were 381/387 vs. 412/433 mL in step 1, 501/270 vs. 492/370 mL in step 2, 509/237 vs. 496/332 mL in step 3, and 496/281 vs. 480/329 mL in step 4. In pressure control the corresponding values were 373/336 vs. 430/414 mL, 416/185 vs. 322/234 mL, 193/108 vs. 176/ 92 mL and 422/201 vs. 481/329mL, respectively (P
» Author: Claude Gu?rin, Martin Cour, Neven Stevic, Florian Degivry, Erwan L?Her, Bruno Louis, Laurent Argaud
» Reference: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245578
» Publication Date: 19/01/2021
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es