
AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website

Generalitat Valenciana
Website

Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website

Cicloplast
Website

Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website

Anarpla
Website

Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website

nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website

Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website

Zicla
Website

Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website

PEFC
Website

ALQUIENVAS
Website

DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website

UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website

OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website

BERL� S.A.
Website

CM PLASTIK
Website

TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS

INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website

RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Simultaneous ventilation in the Covid-19 pandemic. A bench study
COVID-19 pandemic sets the healthcare system to a shortage of ventilators. We aimed at assessing tidal volume (VT) delivery and air recirculation during expiration when one ventilator is divided into 2 test-lungs. The study was performed in a research laboratory in a medical ICU of a University hospital. An ICU (V500) and a lower-level ventilator (Elis?e 350) were attached to two test-lungs (QuickLung) through a dedicated flow-splitter. A 50 mL/cmH2O Compliance (C) and 5 cmH2O/L/s Resistance (R) were set in both A and B test-lungs (A C50R5 / B C50R5, step1), A C50-R20 / B C20-R20 (step 2), A C20-R20 / B C10-R20 (step 3), and A C50-R20 / B C20-R5 (step 4). Each ventilator was set in volume and pressure control mode to deliver 800mL VT. We assessed VT from a pneumotachograph placed immediately before each lung, pendelluft air, and expiratory resistance (circuit and valve). Values are median (1st-3rd quartiles) and compared between ventilators by non-parametric tests. Between Elis?e 350 and V500 in volume control VT in A/B test- lungs were 381/387 vs. 412/433 mL in step 1, 501/270 vs. 492/370 mL in step 2, 509/237 vs. 496/332 mL in step 3, and 496/281 vs. 480/329 mL in step 4. In pressure control the corresponding values were 373/336 vs. 430/414 mL, 416/185 vs. 322/234 mL, 193/108 vs. 176/ 92 mL and 422/201 vs. 481/329mL, respectively (P

» Author: Claude Gu?rin, Martin Cour, Neven Stevic, Florian Degivry, Erwan L?Her, Bruno Louis, Laurent Argaud
» Reference: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245578
» Publication Date: 19/01/2021
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es
