AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website
Generalitat Valenciana
Website
Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website
Cicloplast
Website
Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website
Anarpla
Website
Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website
nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website
Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website
Zicla
Website
Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website
PEFC
Website
ALQUIENVAS
Website
DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website
UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website
OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website
AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website
BERL� S.A.
Website
CM PLASTIK
Website
TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS
INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website
RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Multi-scale smart management of integrated energy systems, Part 2: Weighted multi-objective optimization, multi-criteria decision making, and multi-scale management (3M) methodology
A novel smart management approach is proposed for optimization, management, and analysis of integrated energy systems considering contemporary economic, safety, and environmental policies referred to as 3M methodology. Accordingly, three key scenarios are defined including an urban plant application (S-I), a domestic economic growth policy (S-II), and a sustainable development plan (S-III). The proposed systems are globally optimized considering exergoeconomic, exergorisk, and exergoenvironmental analyses using a weighted multi-objective optimization in accordance with the circumstances of S-I, S-II, and S-III. Subsequently, a suitable optimal system is selected using a hybrid deterministic fuzzy-TOPSIS approach among optimal configurations, and the best working fluid is allocated via system-based multi-scale management. The MGS allocating R718, R141b, R123, R142b, and R365mfc had smaller total environmental impact rate, smaller total cost rate, lower heat losses, and lower consumption of cold utility in all scenarios compared to the CGS. In turn, the CGS allocating R718 had the smallest total specific risk (0.602 injury.MJ?1) in the S-I than the MGS (0.811 injury.MJ?1). However, the MGS allocating R123 had a lower consumption of cold utility in the S-II (3.92?MW) and S-III (3.90?MW).
» Author: Usman Safder, Pouya Ifaei, ChangKyoo Yoo
» Publication Date: 15/10/2019
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es