
AJUNTAMENT D'ALCOI
Website

Generalitat Valenciana
Website

Ayuntamiento de Valencia
Website

Cicloplast
Website

Ayuntamiento de Onil
Website

Anarpla
Website

Ayuntamiento de Mislata
Website

nlWA, North London Waste Authority
Website

Ayuntamiento de Salinas
Website

Zicla
Website

Fondazione Ecosistemi
Website

PEFC
Website

ALQUIENVAS
Website

DIPUTACI� DE VAL�NCIA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE REQUENA
Website

UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA
Website

OBSERVATORIO CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE PAIPORTA
Website

AYUNTAMIENTO DE CUENCA
Website

BERL� S.A.
Website

CM PLASTIK
Website

TRANSFORMADORES INDUSTRIALES ECOL�GICOS

INDUSTRIAS AGAPITO
Website

RUBI KANGURO
Website
If you want to support our LIFE project as a STAKEHOLDER, please contact with us: life-future-project@aimplas.es
In this section, you can access to the latest technical information related to the FUTURE project topic.
Intramedullary nailing of forearm shaft fractures by biodegradable compared with titanium nails: Results of a prospective randomized trial in children with at least two years of follow-up
There are disadvantages in Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) of forearm-shaft fractures, such as the need of implant removal. Biodegradable Intramedullary Nailing (BIN) is a new technique developed for these fractures. We hypothesized that there is no difference in rotational ROM between the patients treated by BIN vs. ESIN.
A randomized, controlled clinical trial included patients, aged 5–15 years, requiring surgery for forearm-shaft fractures. Biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) nails (Activa IM-Nail™, Bioretec Ltd., Finland) were used in 19 and titanium nails (TEN®, SynthesDePuy Ltd., USA) in 16 patients. Rotational ROM of forearm after two years was the primary outcome. Elbow and wrist ROM, pain and radiographic bone healing were secondary outcomes.
Forearm rotation was mean 162° and 151° in BIN and ESIN groups, respectively (P?=?0.201). No difference between the groups was found in any other ROMs. Three cases in the ESIN vs. none in the BIN group reported pain (P?=?0.113). There was no clinically significant residual angulation in radiographs. Two adolescents in the BIN group vs. none in the ESIN (P?=?0.245) were excluded because of implant failure; another two with complete bone union suffered from re-injury. Therefore, satisfactory implant stability among older children needs to be studied.

» Author: Linda Korhonen, Marja Perhomaa, Antti Kyrö, Tytti Pokka, Willy Serlo, Juhani Merikanto, Jaakko Sinikumpu
» Reference: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.011
» Publication Date: 11/09/2018
C/ Gustave Eiffel, 4
(València Parc Tecnològic) - 46980
PATERNA (Valencia) - SPAIN
(+34) 96 136 60 40
Project Management department - Sustainability and Industrial Recovery
life-future-project@aimplas.es
